nzherald.co.nz

Ask Kamo: What's happening on the new rules front?

5:31 AM Friday Mar 16, 2012
Filo Paulo of the Blues tackles Bjorn Basson of the Bulls during the 2012 Super Rugby match between Vodacom Bulls and Blues from Loftus Versfeld on March 10, 2012 in Pretoria, South Africa. Photo / Getty

Filo Paulo of the Blues tackles Bjorn Basson of the Bulls during the 2012 Super Rugby match between Vodacom Bulls and Blues from Loftus Versfeld on March 10, 2012 in Pretoria, South Africa. Photo / Getty

Each week, ex-All Black lock Ian Jones answers readers' questions on the state of rugby.

What's happening on the new rules front? And what can be done to clarify the tackled ball situation? Finally, what's wrong with good old fashioned rucking? Best, AJ

No new rules this year, AJ - just a renewed emphasis with clearer interpretations from the referees in the tackle/ruck area. This zone has been a trouble spot for our game. But with players from both sides getting penalised for not staying on their feet - being unable to support their own body weight - so far in the competition, we've had cleaner ball presentation to the halfbacks, away from the tangle of arms and legs in previous seasons.

This has led to quicker ball, stretched defences and plenty of tries out wide which was the desired outcome. As for good old-fashioned rucking, no problems as long as it's the ball you are moving ... anything other than that and it's not a good look.

Hey Kamo,
Being a proud Northlander and also an ex-Harbour representative, what are your thoughts on a Northland-Harbour Super 15 franchise should there be a future expansion of the tournament? Cheers, Justin

Love your thinking, Justin. Those two unions combined have the geographical spread a Super 15 franchise would need, along with the population base and business/stadium infrastructure to make it sustainable. Now all our new team needs is a competition!

How about this - stay with our three conferences but increase numbers to eight teams per conference. Conference One: Eight New Zealand sides; Conference Two: Five Australian sides, plus three from the Pacific Islands and Japan; Conference Three: Six from South Africa, plus two out of Argentina.

The benefits for New Zealand would be clear. We can sustain eight professional teams here while still having a strong All Black team, some great local derbies and a shorter season for everyone - plus it's a fresh product. Have a think.

Kamo,
With the likes of Parenara, Barrett, Anscombe, Blendayll and Sam Kane playing Super 15 this year, has the NZRU's age-group rugby nursery gazumped the importance of club rugby and ITM Cup in New Zealand? Kids are coming straight from high school - some never playing a full season of club rugby. Cheers, Andy

One of the reasons why we are seeing the emergence of such good young talent in this year's Super 15 comp is down in no small part to the excellent work our academy systems are doing in preparing these men for life as a professional athlete.

If some have to bypass a full club season to achieve that, then it's a sacrifice worth making. None have skipped the ITM Cup and that, along with club rugby, gives us our solid base. Our success at junior World Cup levels proves it is working.

I got three season tickets for the Blues, do you think I should have been better spending my money going to Hamilton? Is this finally the Chiefs' year for greatness? Regards, Paul

You keep hold of those tickets, Paul, and enjoy the ride the Blues will give you.

Tony Woodcock is back next weekend and you will want to be at Eden Park when Ma'a plays at home for the first time, so dress up and make some noise. As for the Chiefs, if the forwards can continue to work the hard yards and share the load at ruck time - who knows where the backs might take us.

G'day,
I'm an Aussie rugby fan and wanted to know: does New Zealand rugby do more harm than good in assisting and developing players from the Pacific Island nations, Fiji, Samoa, and Tonga. Cheers, Nima

In my opinion the NZRU has done a lot of good in developing not only the players from the Pacific Islands, but the nations themselves.

The players plying their trade here get a chance to showcase their talents both in our domestic comp and at Super 15 level and then those not eligible for New Zealand representation (and there are a hell of a lot who are) are released to bolster the nations you talk about. Mo Schwelger, Sona Taumalolo and Tusi Pisi are all great examples of this.

pbpb555 () | 10:48AM Monday, 19 Mar 2012
Hahaha. Kamo, eight teams? may as well just drop super rugby then and only play the ITM Cup. The reason super rugby is at a higher level is because the coaches get to select the top 30 of 100 or so professional rugby players in the unions. Expanding super rugby is a good idea but adding extra NZ teams is not, it will only dilute the talent back down to a ITM cup level.

Bring in a couple argentinian teams and a few pacific island ones, they could form their own conference if they had the money. NZ may have room for one more in the taranaki region. As good as the local derbies are the appeal of the super rugby comp to me is the international fixtures-downing the tri nations teams.
TomH (England) | 10:48AM Monday, 19 Mar 2012
Kamo - you're dreaming on 8 kiwi teams. The 5 teams are struggling with depth now as injuries kick in and it's just the beginning of the season, just look what happened to our Highlanders in the last third of the 2011 season - and that doesn't even take into account the growing pressure of big money from ALL the northern hemisphere countries. There are too many teams in the comp as it is going on the quality of play from a certain number of teams, watering it down will just make it unwatchable for many (and many is where the worldwide TV money comes from).

And on the 'newer' interpretation of the breakdown - much better BUT until players that are either lying on the ground OR are on their knees and still partcipating in the pile are forced to leave the breakdown then it will never be a productive, effective, and aesthetic part of the game as it used to be 10-15 years ago. If you have anything other than your feet on the ground (hands, knees, torsos) then you are out of the game and MUST not compete for teh ball or interfere with other players and must try and leave the breakdown area.
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited