nzherald.co.nz

Mere Tunks: What the Treaty is really about

By Mere Tunks
5:30 AM Friday Feb 17, 2012
There are many positive things happening for Maori, writes Mere Tunks. Photo / Natalie Slade

There are many positive things happening for Maori, writes Mere Tunks. Photo / Natalie Slade

In response to Treaty debate I would like to defend the view of Tariana Turia. Separatism is not the issue. It is the reality of partnership from a Maori perspective also. The aim is partnership, protection and participation as a constitutional right.

The article on Valentine's Day by the senior lecture of film studies at Massey University leaves me wondering is it potentially screening as a "comedy" or joining that of Paul Holmes as a "tragedy"?

To see what positive things are happening in so many places you have only to look around. Tariana and many others have looked at Whanau Ora. This aims at exactly what Te Whanau o Waipareira Trust has struggled as an urban Maori identity to do -- actively functioning within a Government framework to uphold the tikanga of their identity as Maori, answering the need of their people, taking responsibility for the present situation and improving the lot of themselves and their children.

Get a life Paul Holmes, in the shelter of a dominant social group you may be unaware of the hidden talents and the growing changes within the minority, but indigenous, people of Aotearoa.

I do not intend to misinterpret the comments on the article "Treaty Exaltation has gone too far". Clear political and democratic realities differ around Aotearoa. It is also an educational reality that each of us lives in a bubble that seems to be too easily pricked and popped if the sum total of our background cannot equate with the ethnic difference.

The blend referred to in the aforementioned article has nothing to do with "Treaty Rights". It is absolutely true that there is the potential of one group as a majority to "suck and absorb the other". If people are really feeling fed up as this article states then how is there such goodwill in other areas?

Where institutions have worked through and educated their Councils and Management the benefits have grown. Much of this is due to the patience and desire of those who are in those institutions and who are Maori to keep on keeping on.

The writer of the article has a whakapapa with Irish, Tuhoe and French to call on. I can challenge him with a similar whakapapa. Mr French link came when Sam Delamere chased his whale into Whanau a Apanui -- 'Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite' -- then came my Whakatohea link, my Nana had to marry a colonial to live on her confiscated land where my father was born. My mother came from early immigrant Scots (Kerrs, Borderers) and Irish (McCahons, Northern Ballamena).

Through partnership, protection and participation our whanau has happily survived. Surely this is exactly what the Treaty is all about.

* Mere Tunks is from Runanga o Te Whare Wananga o Wairaka.

By Mere Tunks
GHOSTY () | 06:43PM Friday, 17 Feb 2012
The Treaty of Waitangi mentions nothing of a partnership between two peoples it talks of all having equal rights under the Crown. If Maori are the indigenous people of New Zealand then a Redwood tree planted here hundreds of years ago must be considered a native species.
YogiBear (New Zealand) | 06:43PM Friday, 17 Feb 2012
Was thinking you were doing ok until I got to "indigenous". You mention you have Maori roots, yet you seem to foget (conveniently) that Maori came here from another country also only 4 or 5 hundred years before Europeans. To call Maori "indigenous" means you might as well call everyone here "indigenous". Maori never originated in New Zealand so they are not "indigenous".
Mark Bulawa () | 06:45PM Friday, 17 Feb 2012
If I would follow this rule then I should do claims from Russian for over 200 years of oppression. Claim from Germans for half of my family killed, then Ukrainians should claim from Polish goverment too and half of Europe should kill each other. I leave in this country over 10 years, worked from day one, have NZ passport and do not know why I have to pay for something done 200 years ago to some people. There were hard times for us when we used to have $20 to live on during a week but I didn't go to anyone and ask for money. I didn't demand it too. I had to work it out myself. So I think that instead of calling for more money from my TAX Maori could go and work! Then we would not have problems with budget and waste of money on people who does not know what to do with it, who is living on "rest of NZ" back like a flies and calls for more of my blood every day. Just stop it, it is 2012 and this whloe political game should be over, NZ is one and there is no Maori and other dudes. Work out your living instead of taking money out of my work. Indentity you have, nobody takes it out of you, you are Maori and I am not but I do not see any reason why you need to remind me this every day!
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited