nzherald.co.nz

Mark Steel: Dig deep - the Queen needs a yacht

By Mark Steel
5:30 AM Thursday Jan 19, 2012
Queen Elizabeth II. Photo / Supplied

Queen Elizabeth II. Photo / Supplied

One of the talents of Britain's Conservative Party since the days of Margaret Thatcher has been to explain economics as if the country is a household, so everyone can understand ideas such as the need to cut spending when you're in debt. So I imagine they'll use the same homely reasoning to explain their support for a new royal yacht. Because anyone who's run a household knows, when money is tight and you've spent two years insisting your family can't have anything, if you're prudent that's when you buy a 200m yacht with a theatre and a helipad.

That's why, if debts become a serious problem and it feels there's no escape from the bailiffs' letters, you should consult a registered financial adviser, who will explain how to manage the situation by buying a royal yacht for £80 million ($153 million) with a space to seat two royal buses.

Because even in times of austerity we have to be prepared to spend SOME money. And most people, if asked for their feelings about the current restraint, will say, "I understand the need to close the library and the local A&E department. And, while the rise in tuition fees will bankrupt me, I accept it's a necessary measure. But I can't bear the thought that if the Royal Family fancy going on a yacht, they have to hire one because they don't have one of their own", and break down sobbing.

The Daily Mail, which campaigns for this yacht, says "it won't cost you a penny" as it "will be run by a charitable trust", and claims that "we have been touched by generous and unsolicited donations from readers". That's understandable, because if there's one cause that deserves our charity, it's this one. I expect readers from Haiti are enclosing cheques, with a note saying, "Since the earthquake, my family has been living in a sewage pipe but when we saw you had to hold a banquet for the King of Morocco in a palace without the option of bobbling about on a yacht, it put my trifles into perspective."

One minister suggested the yacht would be "an ideal way to thank the Queen for all she's done for this country over 60 years". And certainly it's about time her efforts received a little financial reward. All these years, she's queened away for nothing in return. It's one of the great unsung jobs being Queen, toiling away with barely a moment's recognition.

The yacht will also be used for "training for young people" and "scientific research facilities". You might suggest another way to fund training for young people and scientific research would be to fund training centres, and scientific research. But it's more productive to buy a royal yacht and let selected teenagers and scientists on it for three days a year when it's not being used to entertain Saudi arms dealers. So it would be wrong to sneer. As someone wrote to me yesterday, "monarchists should be allowed their yacht, as long as Republicans get to pick the captain".Independent

By Mark Steel
silver565 (New Zealand) | 10:10AM Thursday, 19 Jan 2012
I was under the impression that the Royal Family's income as given to the crown, and in return they were paid an income(which is far far less than the money they give to the crown).

I wonder what people would say when they found out the amount of money that the royal family actually signs away each year
Kirk (New South Wales) | 11:56AM Thursday, 19 Jan 2012
You are absolutely correct - all people see is the money paid to the royal family not how much money the state gets from property directly owned by the family (as opposed to state owned).

This is often forgotten when people talk about abolishing the monarchy - if that happened all their private estates would remain their own and the state would lose a fortune in income.
Jimmy24 (New Zealand) | 11:56AM Thursday, 19 Jan 2012
The Queen does receives an income from the state know as the Civil List which has its origins in the monarch turning over their income in return for a smaller payment from the government, but the Queen also has the Duchy of Lancaster and other investments which she retains all the income from.

The Prince of Wales has the Duchy of Cornwall which provides his income and none of which is handed over to the government, though he does pay income tax.

See http:/www.royal.gov.uk/TheRoyalHousehold/Royalfinances/Overview.aspx
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited