nzherald.co.nz

John Armstrong: Parliament engages in theatrics over the lone vegetable

By John Armstrong
5:30 AM Wednesday Feb 16, 2011
Labour Party MP Jacinda Ardern criticised the Community Max garden scheme. Photo / Supplied

Labour Party MP Jacinda Ardern criticised the Community Max garden scheme. Photo / Supplied

"We thought Community Max was a bit of a lemon, but it turned out to be a pumpkin."

Ha, ha.

Phil Goff yesterday cracked what is likely to be the worst political joke of the year. In doing so, however, the Labour leader hit the nail firmly on the head.

Without TV3's discovery of a lone pumpkin on site, allegations that nearly $320,000 has been wasted on a Community Max project in the Far North would have been another story about another failed job scheme.

Regardless of the veracity of the story, the pumpkin added a quirky touch, meaning the tale is now etched into public consciousness.

The Government did its best to paint a different picture, repeatedly saying the gardening project had wound up in July last year and TV3 had turned up eight months late.

Unfortunately for National - especially Social Development Minister Paula Bennett - the pumpkin had taken on a life of its own.

"Cinderella," cried Labour MPs intermittently in Parliament. The party's new employment spokeswoman, Jacinda Ardern, had even brought a fine specimen of genus cucurbita to the House, prompting National's Gerry Brownlee to quip: "Jacinda's waiting for midnight."

But fortuitously for Bennett her golden coach had arrived in the form of a long-booked flight to Washington which left before the story surfaced on Monday evening.

In her absence, colleague Simon Power - who exudes the persona of a Prince Charming - was chosen to field questions on her behalf. He told the House that around 70 per cent of the Community Max programme "graduates" had not gone back on to any benefit.

He then tried to put his tormentor, Labour's Annette King, on the spot, by recalling two gangs in Timaru that received money through a pilot employment scheme and used it to upgrade their headquarters while she was Minister of Employment.

The fact that this occurred way back in 1989 was drowned out by the cheers and laughter of Power's colleagues.

There was more to come. Power cited statements from no fewer than four Labour MPs in recent months expressing what sounded like support for Community Max. National's research unit was working overtime.

Ardern - one of those MPs - sought to drag Power back to the matter at hand. "Why has [Bennett] spent more than $300,000 on a garden that has left participants unemployed and produced just one pumpkin?"

But Power had not finished raking over history, reminding everyone of the Labour Department's funding of a $26,000 worldwide trip for two women to study hip-hop which took place when Labour was in power.

Power made a good fist of covering for Bennett. But for all the fun had in Parliament's version of the pumpkin patch, there was a distinct feeling of deja vu.

No matter how successful taxpayer-funded job schemes may be, any accompanying failures are what grabs the attention, whacking the Cabinet minister responsible for them in the process.

Bennett, who has managed her portfolio for the past two years without making any huge howlers, now knows she is not exempt.

By John Armstrong
TheOwl (Auckland Central) | 10:16AM Wednesday, 16 Feb 2011
These schemes have been going on for over 2 decades, unless they have follow ups like referrals, getting jobs out of them will be very low.

I attended two in the 1980's. One at Ruakura in Hamilton, the other clearing streams of fallen trees, fortunately I went of for basic training after a week of that, neither got me jobs, the territorial army was my best referree.
John--b (New Zealand) | 10:25AM Wednesday, 16 Feb 2011
'...Bennett, who has managed her portfolio for the past two years without making any huge howlers, now knows she is not exempt."

You are kidding! Bennett released the name of a benificary under protection of parliament for her own political agenda, That's a howler!

As for the project, using public funds to finance "employment development", this really never works and benefits a very small number of people for a very brief period of time.
Pacman (Hamilton) | 12:18PM Wednesday, 16 Feb 2011
Personally, I think beneficiaries growing veges is a good thing. The following courses should be compulsory for all beneficiaries (maybe MPs as well):
- How to write a CV
- How to grow veges
- How to apply for jobs
- Minimum of level 4 literacy, numeracy, accounting, cooking, sewing
The story is a joke, the course finished months ago, I think New Zealanders can read between the lines:

- It was a slow news day
- Media thought it was 1st April
- Perhaps they could have kept the garden after the course finished, during a drought. Or perhaps they were right to leave it till next year before replanting.
I consider 40% a good success rate for things like this. 70% is marvellous.

Regardless of whether the new job was found for the participants, or whether they got off their butts (or more accurately, stayed off their butts) and got their next jobs themselves. Both are signs of success.
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited