nzherald.co.nz

Up the duff and taking a puff

By Dita De Boni
2:20 PM Monday Nov 29, 2010
The Growing Up in New Zealand longitudinal study shows that 11 per cent of women smoke throughout their pregnancies. Photo / Thinkstock

The Growing Up in New Zealand longitudinal study shows that 11 per cent of women smoke throughout their pregnancies. Photo / Thinkstock

The first results from a study of 7000 Auckland and Waikato babies are out, and they show that 11 per cent of women smoke throughout their pregnancies.

The Growing Up in New Zealand longitudinal study suggests that while many of these expectant mums cut back on their tobacco, they were still smoking around 8 each day.

Maori women, those living in poorer areas, and those without significant educational attainment were over-represented in the number.

Whatever the mitigating factors, it's certainly not fair to make your little baby smoke cigarettes - it's plain wrong.

And I suppose the same kind of person who doesn't care about the small birthweight issue won't pay a jot of notice to news out of the UK this week, that smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of that child turning to crime: cigarette smoking, apparently, has now been found to cause negative changes in the developing brain.

Having said all that, I am no wowser on the issue of smoking.

I detest being bashed over the head with anti-smoking rhetoric at every turn. And I was a smoker - all through my 20s, not a heavy smoker, but a committed social smoker.

And then I got pregnant, and quit. Like many female smokers.

I didn't love it so much that I would force the habit on my unborn child. Not only that, but I'm basically a goody two-shoes. And an asthmatic.

There are some women who are so addicted, so nihilistic, I guess, that they would keep smoking through their pregnancies, and in fact there are some who go on to produce perfectly healthy babies. These women, too, know they run the risk of harming their babies. They don't respond to the same messaging other people do, for whatever reason.

So perhaps now is the time to re-think the millions spent on smoking prevention. Accept the fact that there will always be a smoking hardcore. As most smokers pay for their healthcare by taxes on tobacco, and further, remove themselves from the picture altogether at a much younger age, freeing up the healthcare system for non-smokers, they should be left alone.

I reckon we might get better value for money by stopping general anti-smoking messaging altogether - while providing the already-excellent Quitline services for those who really do want to stop - and only focus, and focus intensively, on preventing pregnant women and teens from smoking.

Perhaps pregnant women seeing their healthcare provider for the first time could automatically be assigned a quit-smoking counsellor, or prescribed a funded course of anti-smoking acupuncture or even hypnotism.

A new approach to these hardcore smokers certainly seems called for.

By Dita De Boni
midwife (New Zealand) | 07:50PM Monday, 29 Nov 2010
I'm a midwife that encourages pregnant women to ring Quitline, or use the nicotine replacement that I can prescribe.to be told that they don't want to give up smoking. Leave them to it I say. My husband is somewhat more militant about it.he believes anyone drinking alcohol or smoking cigarettes during pregnancy should be charged with child abuse.
Mark (South Korea) | 07:51PM Monday, 29 Nov 2010
I can't help but think of the phrase, out of site - out of mind. If there were no messages, no-one would remember to stop smoking. I mean, everyone may know it's bad for them, but if they weren't constantly reminded of it, maybe they wouldn't bother to quit.
I also think that poorer smokers get allowances in their benefits, so we are actually paying for them to smoke as well really.
Another thing I would like to point out is that it is not only smokers that die, it is second hand smokers as well. Why should I die earlier just because once every couple of days I have to walk up Queen Street behind a smoker? Or more importantly, why should I have to return home smelling like a rolled all over a homeless man?
I think if we ban smoking all together, only the real hard core smokers will keep doing it. So they will be the only ones that die, I dont really mind if I have to pay a little extra for their health care if natural selection sorts them out.
Also if banned it will become more of a treat at parties etc, rather than a constant death stapel.
As an ex smoker I find smokers generally weak of mind. It's hard, but not that hard, you've just got to have the guts to keep at it.
St George (New Zealand) | 07:51PM Monday, 29 Nov 2010
My mother continued to smoke during her pregnancy with me - because the doctor advised it would be too much of a shock to her if she was to quit. Cases such as this may not be common but they certainly exist and I can imagine it must be very hard for the mum-to-be under such instructions - especially in the face of chest-thumping moral pronouncements such as this.
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited