nzherald.co.nz

Babes on planes: can it work?

By Jim Eagles
8:33 AM Wednesday Jun 24, 2009
If only the wee things would sleep the whole way...

If only the wee things would sleep the whole way...

It's always hard to know when to take the baby on a flight. The result of doing so can be hours of misery for you and everyone else on the plane. But not going can seriously curtail your travel opportunities including, often, the chance for baby to meet the rest of the family.

The good news is that airlines and airports have, mostly, made a huge effort in recent years to become more family friendly. But have their efforts really produced practical results? I think they have.

Consider the following two accounts, one of a domestic outing, the other of a long-haul international flight:

"It's a difficult choice: whether to try entertaining a toddler in the car for eight hours on the drive from Auckland to Wellington or take them on a one-hour flight, during which you hope they'll behave and not annoy other passengers.

The bonus of the car journey is that the 3-year-old's tantrums are for your ears only and you don't have to worry about dirty looks from other travellers. The advantage of the flight is that it's more than seven hours shorter than the car ride.

We were glad we chose the plane option. The crew on our Air New Zealand flight turned into entertainment directors, fussing over the toddler from start to finish, making his trip very special and ours very easy.

They pretended to be fascinated when he showed them his favourite toy (a stuffed giraffe, whose name they discovered is "Giraffe") and talked to him at length about his upcoming holiday.

There were extra bottles of water and fruit but the highlight was a Mr Men stencil and colouring set they surprised him with. We'll never take the car again."

- Michele Crawshaw

"The queue for the flight from Auckland to London, via Los Angeles, was long so the plan was for the grandparents to mind the baby until I reached the check-in desk. We asked the security guy if that would be okay and he pointed to a separate family check-in area and even cleared a path through all the lane markers to provide easier access.

The guy at family check-in was tremendously cheerful and helpful, talking to the baby and coming out from behind the counter to make sure baggage tags were placed properly on the buggy bits.

On the Air NZ flight to LA the flight attendants were amazing, taking Maeve off me as soon as I got on so I could put my stuff away, bringing me a drink before takeoff, and little things like taking away my meal trays early so that it was easier to move, bringing lots of drinks, constantly checking I didn't need anything, and one even took the baby off for a wander around the plane.

LA airport was similarly helpful. They have a priority security lane for people with young children. As the machine couldn't read my fingerprints I had to go to another room to be rescanned and the baggage guy got all my baggage off the carousel, put it on a trolley, then went to find my pushchair.

The crew on the LA-London flight were fine but just didn't do any of those helpful extras. Overall, Air NZ was much better than Virgin Atlantic with whom we've flown previously.

The worst bit was Heathrow. I had been dreading LA, but they seem to have undergone customer relations training.

The same can't be said about Heathrow. The immigration guy grilled me about Maeve being mine as we had different names. Fair enough, I suppose, but he was pretty dour about it.

Then in the baggage claim area I was told by two separate baggage handlers that my pushchair would come out on the carousel and the signs said the same thing.

The baggage handlers were totally indifferent, all just standing around chatting, so I was helped with my luggage by a fellow passenger. Then it turned out that pushchairs come out as oversize baggage which was behind a big hoarding with no signs on it to indicate it was there. I only found it by following other bewildered passengers with small children.

It gave a very poor impression of Britain and made me want to turn round and get back on the plane."

- Kate Gardner

If those stories are fairly typical it does suggest that - while the kind of support you'll get varies a bit according to who you're travelling with and what mood the cabin crew is in - overall it is becoming easier to take the kids along.

But what's your experience? Are some airlines and airports better than others? How do hotels and resorts measure up family-wise?

By Jim Eagles
Kiwi_Bloke (Hamilton) | 12:36PM Wednesday, 24 Jun 2009
My wife recently flew from Hamilton to Christchurch with our two children (with Air New Zealand). I'd like to say it was a pleasurable experience with dealing with the staff, but it wasn't. First off, it took half an hour to get checked in as we wanted to use our child seats for our 3 yo daughter and 1 yo son. Originally they weren't going to allow the car seats on, but after I got a bit agitated, the check in girl did a bit of enquiring and finally allowed one of the child seats on the plane. Now I know this sounds rather picky, but it is well documented that lap belts and young children are very dangerous. This is not just true in cars, but planes as well. Then, on our way to the departure gate, we were stopped by 3 cabin crew who advised us that we couldn't take the car seat onto the plane. At this point my patience snapped. Their reasoning was that as our son was 1 yo, he was to sit on my wife's lap. Fortunately we had paid for an actual seat for my son for the sheer reason we didn't think that him sitting unrestrained was a safe practice (which it isn't). In summary, Air NZ has a long way to go before I'd consider them family friendly.
scooter (New Zealand) | 12:36PM Wednesday, 24 Jun 2009
Completely agree with the comments around Air New Zealand, they are sensational we have taken a few recent 3hr + trips & the staff (0800 phone staff + check in + flight crew) need to be congratulated on how aware of the needs of parents with toddlers around that 2 year old age they are. I don't think anyone can truly take away the frustration of sitting in a small space with a little cherub who has ants in his pants but Air New Zealand certainly do their best. We are heading off on an 11 hour flight with Air New Zealand with our toddler in a few weeks & he has his own seat booked & we will use a car seat to lock him in, I don't think we would have had the confidence to do 2x 11 hour flights had it not been for the way Air New Zealand had looked after us previously on these shorter haul flights.
Kylie (Hamilton) | 08:24AM Thursday, 25 Jun 2009
Emirates and Air Zealand both do fantastic bulkhead bassinets for babies under 11kgs, which are a boon on long flights. They couldn't be more helpful and are genuinely delightful with children. I have (four times) taken three kids under four to Australia and back and they have been exceptional every trip. (The airlines and the kids! ;>)
Qantas, on the other hand. Ordinary. And as for Virgin Blue. Oh _dear_. Appalling attitude to kids every trip and just no help whatsoever.

But make sure you do your bit by checking out the regulations. If you want to take car seats on the plane you can, but you must call the airline beforehand and give them the serial number of the seat as only certain seats are approved for plane use. And you must book a window seat for them as it is illegal to use them on aisles as they can block people from getting out. And some airlines count checked car seats as part of your baggage weight, while others carry them as an extra piece at no charge.
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited