nzherald.co.nz

Leave your wardrobe at home

By Jim Eagles
2:49 PM Friday Aug 15, 2008

I'm delighted to see that airlines are finally taking steps to encourage passengers to cut back on the ridiculous amount of luggage some of them travel with.

Many a time I've stood waiting in the check-in queue while some fellow travellers, usually overweight themselves, pass over a couple of huge suitcases plus half a dozen smaller bags, cases and parcels to be loaded on the plane.

Then they head for the duty-free shops, already with half a dozen more items over their shoulders to be stuffed into the overhead lockers.

All of that means more weight to be carried and so more fuel to be burned, more luggage to be loaded and so slower and more expensive turnarounds for the aircraft, and in the end higher air fares for all of us.

And the fact is, except in special circumstances, it's not necessary to take so much.

My wife and I recently survived a five-week holiday in Europe, with activities ranging from cycling round Provence to dining in a two-star restaurant in Paris, with just a single small suitcase and a small cabin bag each.

If we can do it, why can't others? Why should we have to subsidise the fares of people who don't know how to pack?

Cut-price airlines have been charging people for check-in baggage. Pacific Blue, for instance, adds a fee of $8 if you pre-pay when you book or $20 at the airport for an initial 23kg of baggage.

I'm not entirely enthusiastic about that, because judging from what I've seen in Europe it does encourage people to take everything as cabin baggage, leading to a free-for-all during boarding.

But it certainly succeeds in reducing handling costs and making travellers think more carefully before they pack.

I think I prefer Air New Zealand's new system, which comes into effect on domestic flights on September 15, whereby you get one bag of up to 25kg for free and thereafter you pay.

If for some reason you have to carry a second bag, like the time I was required to transport a toy fish tank for a new granddaughter, it's only $15 extra, which isn't exactly the end of the world and certainly cheaper than posting it.

The 25kg limit is probably a bit higher than necessary. Qantas gives you only 20kg free on domestic flights but I guess the airline is trying to ease the system in without upsetting customers.

And it is a step in the right direction which will reduce baggage handling costs while hopefully getting people to think more carefully about what they really need to take on a trip.

Now, if we can only get the airlines to enforce their rules on carry-on luggage consistently and firmly, we might really get somewhere.

 

 

By Jim Eagles
Womble (Auckland Central) | 02:54PM Tuesday, 12 Aug 2008
My suggestion is to have every person plus there baggage weighed at the check-in, would give a more accurate total weight of what is being carried on flights. Why should I (52kgs) + bag (20kgs)=72kgs have to subsidise someone who is rather large and their bags? A total weight say 100kgs and you pay after that. Or will the overweight population say they are being discriminated against? I pay for a seat which I expect to have to myself not share because the large person next door spills over into it. Airlines need to address this issue to.
mchaggis (Auckland Region) | 03:19PM Tuesday, 12 Aug 2008
Yes, I agree totally with the contents of this article, especially concerning carry on cabin luggage. Having done some travelling myself, on several occasions I have had to stow my cabin bag under my feet, because there isn't enough room in the overhead storage locker. I'm amazed people are allowed to carry duty free items onto an aircraft, in separate bags, as well as their regulation one piece of hand luggage! It seems to be this extra baggage which utilizes most of the storage space in the overhead lockers, thus preventing others with only one small piece of hand luggage, to store their item. It's about time airlines toughened up when it comes to cabin baggage. One and one piece only of hand luggage per passenger and that's it. No duty free in the overhead lockers, unless it's packed away in the cabin bag.
Brentb (Henderson) | 12:30PM Wednesday, 13 Aug 2008
Womble is right on the mark - my wife comments that she is only 49kgs so she should be able to have a heavier bag-although 100g is a bit light.
But seriously,we pack light and only take one carry on bag between us. What really amazes us is the number of bags that families have as hand luggage. Each family member has a carry on bag-even young children and infants. Does a small child actually need their own bag-regulations say they can but is it necessary.
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited