John Armstrong is the Herald's chief political commentator

John Armstrong: Voters need to stop politicians suiting themselves

It is now up to voters to say what they want and do not want in MMP. Photo / Brett Phibbs
It is now up to voters to say what they want and do not want in MMP. Photo / Brett Phibbs

They might not agree on much, but the two lobby groups on opposing sides of last year's MMP referendum have spoken in unison.

The pro-MMP Campaign for MMP and the anti-MMP Voters for Change had a simple but blunt message: don't let the politicians make the changes they want or block the ones they don't want.

Bad enough that the review bars the commission from considering two of the major components of the system - Maori representation and the size of Parliament.

Preventing the commission from canvassing the size of Parliament is ludicrous, given the MMP review is charged with solving the looming dilemma of keeping Parliament proportional as the population grows.

That aside, the commission's purview still covers a number of aspects of MMP where change would likely not be to the liking of political parties.

These include whether to ban so-called "dual candidacy" where candidates who lose electorate contests get into Parliament by virtue of a high list placing; whether list MPs should be able to contest byelections; whether to introduce open lists which would see voters rather than parties ranking the candidates; and whether the one-seat threshold which saw Act get five MPs into Parliament in 2008 by virtue of winning the Epsom electorate should be canned.

The good news is that the commission's review looks like being far more rigorous and authoritative than the limp effort conducted by a parliamentary select committee back in 2001, which left people feeling short-changed.

That committee's report produced nothing in the way of major recommendations because its members from parties across Parliament could not reach unanimity on a range of matters.

Former Justice Minister Simon Power - who wrote the law triggering the review if MMP was retained in the 2011 referendum - deserves credit for realising the 2001 review was a debacle.

The commission deserves credit for the way it is conducting the review. Yesterday it released a consultation paper as the first basis for public submissions.

Once those have been considered, it will then put out a proposals paper for further public submission before making its final recommendations to Justice Minister Judith Collins by the end of October.

The process - to be backed up by a $1.6 million budget to be spent on advertising and market research - will ensure its recommendations carry significant weight.

They will have to do so to force change. Otherwise, they could fall foul of political bickering or obstruction.

The determining factor will be how deeply the public engages with the exercise.

It is now up to voters to say what they want and do not want in MMP. And not least because this may be their last chance to do so for some time.

- NZ Herald

Get the news delivered straight to your inbox

Receive the day’s news, sport and entertainment in our daily email newsletter

John Armstrong is the Herald's chief political commentator

Herald political correspondent John Armstrong has been covering politics at a national level for nearly 30 years. Based in the Press Gallery at Parliament in Wellington, John has worked for the Herald since 1987. John was named Best Columnist at the 2013 Canon Media Awards and was a previous winner of Qantas media awards as best political columnist. Prior to joining the Herald, John worked at Parliament for the New Zealand Press Association. A graduate of Canterbury University's journalism school, John began his career in journalism in 1981 on the Christchurch Star. John has a Masters of Arts degree in political science from Canterbury.

Read more by John Armstrong

Have your say

1200 characters left

By and large our readers' comments are respectful and courteous. We're sure you'll fit in well.
View commenting guidelines.

Sort by
  • Oldest

© Copyright 2017, NZME. Publishing Limited

Assembled by: (static) on production bpcf04 at 26 May 2017 13:12:39 Processing Time: 316ms