A former Inland Revenue Department staff member who fleeced taxpayers and her old employer of $225,000 blamed her predicament on gang members who she said wanted tens of thousands of dollars for a missing package.
But a judge dismissed her story as "somewhat hollow and fanciful" and blamed her problems on a chronic gambling habit before sending her to jail.
Anita Gail O'Connor was yesterday sentenced at the Hamilton District Court to two years and five months in prison for a scam in which she created bogus passports, birth certificates, IRD numbers and application forms to net thousands of dollars.
The Ngaruawahia 59-year-old, who had earlier pleaded guilty to 163 charges of fraud, worked at the department for 17 years before she took voluntary redundancy in 2009.
The court heard how O'Connor's offending began in 2004 while working in international child support at the IRD, where she would take birth certificates received with taxpayer applications.
She used twink on the certificates then paid two people to modify them further.
With the false identities she set up bank accounts into which a total of just over $222,000 was paid.
A summary of facts revealed O'Connor used the identities of three women living in Australia to get Working for Families tax credits and accessed the department's computer system to get information on 13 men and 11 child support customers whose tax credits and refunds were diverted back to the two bank accounts.
In all, the IRD paid $128,242.96 to one of her accounts and $93,989.76 into the other between June 2007 and November 2010. Work and Income NZ also made deposits of $3084.07 into one account.
The IRD began investigating her almost a year after she was made redundant when a customer told them that an incorrect bank account was associated with her account.
By then, O'Connor had spent much of the cash on cars for herself and her daughter. She bought electronic goods, groceries and spent on pokie machines.
Judge Glen Marshall said the scale of her offending was large but he took into account her poor health, her previously clean record, good character and early guilty plea.
But he questioned her remorse, particularly as key facts in a story about intimidation by gang members, who she claimed wanted $100,000 from her for a lost package, appeared to change over the course of a number of interviews.
"The [explanation] seems somewhat hollow and fanciful and my view is it is an attempt to cover up the fact that your gambling had become such a problem ..."
The IRD is seeking a return of the stolen money plus interest, penalties and costs for a total of $362,000.
EXTENT OF OFFENDING
Corrupt use of official information: 24 charges
Dishonestly taking a document: 3 charges
Obtaining by deception: 17 charges
Accessing computer system for dishonest purpose: 27 charges
Forgery: 46 charges
Using forged documents: 46 charges
Funds received under bogus pretences: $222,232 from the Inland Revenue Department, $3084 from Work and Income New Zealand
What the IRD wants back:
$362,000 (includes interest, penalties and costs)