Brian Rudman 's Opinion

Brian Rudman is a NZ Herald feature writer and columnist.

Brian Rudman: $59 billion plan misses the bus

75 comments
Vision for Auckland's future is for even worse congestion in a city where the car will remain king.

Even with a $59 billion spend, the roads will end up more clogged than now. Photo / Sarah Ivey
Even with a $59 billion spend, the roads will end up more clogged than now. Photo / Sarah Ivey

So let me get this right. Auckland Transport is proposing to spend $59 billion over the next 30 years on an "integrated transport programme" that will, if achieved as planned, block up Auckland's streets in a traffic mess even worse than now.

Even a lowly bus passenger such as myself can't see the logic in a plan that comes up with such a solution. Especially when only $34 billion of the $59 billion required to complete it is actually guaranteed from either local or central government funds.

"Even with the fully funded programme," admit the authors, "road congestion levels will deteriorate with volume/capacity ratios exceeding 100 per cent on most of our arterial road network by 2041 and emission levels exceeding current levels". The outcome is even worse if Auckland is left with just the $34 billion to play with. In that case, AT could "do little more than ongoing maintenance, operation renewal [and] management of the network" together with any new projects already under way or approved.

Given such a gloomy prognosis, the bus passenger in me is forced to ask what possesses the transport planners to persevere with what is obviously a spectacularly failed formula.

By 2041, the mayor's Auckland Plan is to have between 700,000 and one million extra residents in his compact isthmus city. It seems as obvious as dog's knackers that we might have enough space for the extra people, but there's no way we're going to be able to accommodate their cars as well - not as their regular mode of transport to work and to drop their kids off to school anyway.

But instead, the report persists with advancing the merits of a "multi-modal transport system" with the car, by 2041, being even more the king as passenger vehicle, by percentage of commuters carried, than it is at present. No wonder, even with a $59 billion spend, that the roads will end up even more clogged than now.

There's a salutary chart within the report of Auckland public transport usage over the past 90 years. The current 69.5 million public transport trips a year is dwarfed by the near 120 million trips achieved in 1945 - a record peak helped out by wartime petrol rationing. Still, today's urban Auckland population is 1.5 million, nearly six times the 263,370 living here in 1945. If the planners needed guidance on the direction to take in providing a winning transport system for a liveable compact city of 2.5 million people, then the clue is sitting there in that very graph.

The target in the new report's multi-modal approach is to match the 1945 peak by around 2018 and hit 140 million by 2022. But the recent fall-off in patronage shows that drawing graphs is easier than getting bums on seats. The target is to increase the morning peak, non car-based mode share from 23 per cent to 45 per cent. That means doubling the number of commuters who walk, cycle or catch public transport to work or school. The plan refers to this as an "aspirational target" which sounds rather defeatist, given that failure means citywide gridlock, and not just at peak times. Waving its stick, the report adds that to achieve the aspirational goal, "new policy levers such as demand management may be necessary".

By demand management it means rationing the use of the roads with all the old devices that politicians have considered and shied away from in the past like roads pricing, cordon tolling, congestion tolling and the like. All devices which favour the well-off and the large numbers who drive job-provided cars.

The outcome of Auckland Council's probe into alternative methods for funding the giant short-fall mentioned above is still to be announced. This is a subject that's been flogged to death so many times it's hard to believe the team, headed by former regional council CEO Peter Winder, will have come up with some magical new way of turning volcanic scoria into gold.

The Labour Government agreed to Auckland requests for a regional fuel tax, but the Key Government rejected that option.

Of course there's always higher rates, but Mayor Len Brown and his councillors are not going to commit electoral suicide by supporting that. But even if extra funding was available, the question must be, is trying to squeeze more and more cars into a finite space, the right way to go.

- NZ Herald

Brian Rudman

Brian Rudman is a NZ Herald feature writer and columnist.

Brian Rudman's first news story was for Auckland University student paper Outspoke, exposing an SIS spy on campus during the heady days of the Vietnam War. It resulted in a Commission of Inquiry and an award for student journalist of the year. A stint editing the Labour Party's start-up Auckland newspaper NZ Statesman followed. Rudman decided journalism was the career for him, but the NZ Herald and Auckland Star thought otherwise when he came job-hunting. After a year on the "hippy trail" overland to London, he spent four years on Fleet St with various British provincial papers. He then joined the Auckland Star, winning the Dulux Journalist of the Year award for coverage of the 1976 Dawn Raids against Polynesian overstayers. He has also worked on the NZ Listener, Auckland Sun, and since 1996, for the NZ Herald as feature writer and columnist. He has a BA in History and Politics.

Read more by Brian Rudman

Have your say

We aim to have healthy debate. But we won't publish comments that abuse others. View commenting guidelines.

1200 characters left

Sort by
  • Oldest

© Copyright 2014, APN New Zealand Limited

Assembled by: (static) on red akl_a2 at 20 Sep 2014 06:51:24 Processing Time: 639ms